A thesis conclusion answers the research question in plain terms, says what follows from that answer, and admits what the study could not settle. It adds no new findings. Someone who jumps from your introduction to your last chapter should see the question asked and answered.
Sacred Heart University's guide is blunt about new material: “Don't surprise the reader with new information in your Conclusion that was never referenced anywhere else in the paper.” It also says this is the chapter where you place your research in a larger context.
| Belongs | Doesn't belong |
|---|---|
| The answer to your research question | A chapter-by-chapter recap with no answer in it |
| What the answer means for your field or practice | Findings, sources, or arguments that appear nowhere earlier |
| The limitations that qualify the answer | Details of your method or tables, which are in earlier chapters |
| Recommendations your findings can support | Recommendations about groups you never studied |
| Questions for further research that follow from your study | A general wish for more research on the topic |
Only in part. The University of Kansas journalism handbook says conclusions summarize the main points of the research and its implications. The University of North Carolina Writing Center adds a caution for papers in general: “Synthesize, don’t summarize.” A short recap can stay, as long as each repeated finding serves the answer you are giving.
A master's thesis studies nurse handoffs through twelve interviews at one community hospital in Ohio. Its conclusion says: "Hospitals should replace verbal handoffs with a standard form."
A committee member might ask: how many hospitals? Did you compare the two types of handoff, or did nurses tell you what they prefer? A version the study can support says what these nurses reported, why it might matter elsewhere, and what kind of study could test it.
State what you found, what limits it, and what this means for the idea you started with. A null result answers your question too, and hiding it weakens the chapter.
Kansas gives 3-5 pages for a thesis of about 50-75 pages and 10-15 for the discussion, as rough estimates. If your conclusion runs longer than your discussion, compare the two for repeated material. Your handbook or advisor can tell you what your program expects.
Esmond evaluates every assignment before you submit. It never writes it.
Esmond reads your conclusion against your research question and your findings. It comments where the conclusion clearly goes further than your data or leaves the question open. Whether the thesis passes is for your committee to decide, and Esmond makes no prediction about that.
It is better not to. If a source matters to your argument, it belongs in your review or discussion, where you can use it properly.
Sacred Heart advises against phrases like that in a paper, since the heading already says where you are. Start with the answer instead.
Some five-chapter formats put them in a shared final chapter, often titled "Conclusions and Recommendations." Follow your program's format.
Only those that change how someone should take your answer, in a sentence or two. Sacred Heart's guide says problems you ran into during the study should qualify your overall conclusions. The full discussion of limitations belongs earlier.
Read on November 3, 2026.
Esmond is not taking orders on this site yet.