On November 9, 2026 we found no Graduate College rule at the University of Arizona on AI in theses and dissertations. The university's student AI page covers coursework and says colleges and departments can set their own rules. One department that has done so for theses is Communication: its Graduate Handbook 2024-2025 (updated February 2025) allows generative AI for sampling, coding and data analysis after you consult your committee, allows AI-assisted editing of your own text, and prohibits using AI to produce the thesis, dissertation or proposal. Any AI use must be acknowledged and cited.
If your AI statement clearly doesn't cover what you describe elsewhere in your thesis, Esmond points it out.
The University of Arizona publishes Student AI Guidelines & Principles on its central AI site. That page is about classes. For assignments it says “You can only use AI for assignments if your instructor says it’s OK.” It then points to local rules: “Some colleges or departments have their own guidelines for AI use”, and it lists examples from the College of Medicine (Tucson) and the College of Law.
We found no comparable text from the Graduate College for theses and dissertations. This page therefore rests on one department, Communication. Its rule applies to Communication MA and PhD students. It is not a university-wide rule, and it is separate from Arizona State University and from the University of Arizona Global Campus, which have their own texts.
A hypothetical example of a commentYour results chapter reports intercoder reliability for six of the seven frame categories. The seventh, conflict framing, carries most of your discussion. What was its agreement, and does the conclusion about conflict framing depend on it?
A first comment on one part of your own draft, right away and without an account.
Get a free previewThe Artificial Intelligence Policy sits in the last part of the Communication Graduate Handbook. For theses and dissertations it starts with research uses: “For theses and dissertations, generative AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Verde, Dall-e, Bard, Ollama) may be used for sampling, coding, and data analysis.” The handbook makes you responsible for consulting your committee about any AI use for research purposes and following its guidance. It also warns against overreliance on AI in research and asks for careful checking of anything AI produces.
On disclosure it is short: “If AI generative tools are used, they must be appropriately acknowledged and cited.” It links to the APA Style guidance on citing ChatGPT for the format.
Then comes the limit. Using AI to produce the text of your thesis, dissertation or proposal is prohibited, and the handbook says this is treated as academic dishonesty under the University of Arizona Code of Academic Integrity.
Editing gets its own sentence: “AI-assisted editing of your original work is allowed but should be used with caution.” The handbook gives a reason for the caution. AI-detection software used by academic journals, it says, will likely not tell AI-generated text from AI-edited text, so its advice is to use AI sparingly for editing.
For the stages before the text, the handbook takes a hands-off position. It says the department does not regulate how students use AI to search for research or to summarize research for their own records. It adds that many AI tools produce inaccurate or misleading information and that you remain responsible for the accuracy of what is in your thesis or dissertation.
| Use | Communication handbook | What to have ready (our suggestion) |
|---|---|---|
| Sampling, coding, data analysis | Allowed after consulting your committee; follow its guidance | The committee's answer and a record of prompts and settings |
| Searching for and summarizing research for your notes | Not regulated by the department | The original source behind every summary you rely on |
| Editing your own text | Allowed, with caution and sparingly | Your version before editing |
| Producing thesis, dissertation or proposal text | Prohibited | Nothing to prepare; this use is excluded |
| Any AI use | Acknowledged and cited (APA guidance) | Tool name, date and what it did |
The same policy treats comprehensive exams separately. Using generative AI for writing in a comprehensive exam is strictly prohibited. The handbook does not recommend using AI to study for the exams, though it says it cannot control how students prepare. For coursework, it sends you to the AI policy in each syllabus and tells you to ask the professor when the syllabus is unclear.
Most graduate programs at the University of Arizona are outside Communication. To find the rule that applies to you:
This example is made up. A Communication MA student studies how health agencies frame vaccine messages on social media. With her committee's agreement, she uses a generative tool to code 2,400 posts, checks 300 of them by hand, and acknowledges and cites the tool in the methods chapter. Separately, she has a tool summarize 30 articles for her reading notes, which the handbook leaves to the student. Close to the deadline, she moves three of those summaries, lightly edited, into her literature review. The coding is a permitted research use with consultation and citation. The three paragraphs are now AI-produced thesis text, which the handbook prohibits, and her acknowledgment does not mention them.
Esmond evaluates every assignment before you submit. It never writes it.
Esmond is an AI tool that doesn't write for you. If your course doesn't allow any AI tools, don't use Esmond for that work. If you're unsure, ask your instructor or advisor.
Esmond evaluates the content of a draft from within your field. It points out factual errors, inconsistencies and blind spots, as shown in how Esmond works and in a sample report. The Communication handbook does not name feedback tools. It does ask you to acknowledge and cite any AI tool you use, and to consult your committee about AI in your research, so tell your committee before you use Esmond on the thesis and ask how they want it acknowledged. In another department, check that department's handbook and see whether you can use Esmond. The University of Arizona has not reviewed or approved Esmond.
We found no university-wide ban. The Communication department allows generative AI for sampling, coding and data analysis after consulting your committee, and prohibits using it to produce the thesis text.
We did not find one on November 9, 2026. That does not mean none exists, so check with your program.
Yes. The handbook says AI tools that are used must be appropriately acknowledged and cited, and it points to the APA Style guidance.
AI-assisted editing of your own text is allowed, with caution. The handbook advises using it sparingly.
No. Arizona State University is a separate university with its own Graduate College rule. See the ASU page linked below.
Read on November 9, 2026.
Get your paper evaluated before you submit