For students in Nigeria, Ghana or Kenya with a draft Chapter One of a research project, at undergraduate, HND or master's level. The page takes the sections one by one, quotes five university guides, and shows how Chapter One has to line up with Chapters Three and Four. It gives no sample chapter to copy.
No one sees their own blind spots, with or without AI help. Esmond points them out in your draft from within your field, along with factual errors and inconsistencies.
Chapter One sets the terms of the whole project: the problem, what the study will find out, and its boundaries. Every later chapter is read against it.
The Manual of Style of Nnamdi Azikiwe University (UNIZIK) in Nigeria lists the sections of Chapter One in this order: background to the study, statement of the problem, aim or purpose, research objectives, significance of the study, scope of the study, research questions and research hypotheses, some of them marked where applicable; it places the operational definition of terms among the preliminary pages. Kumasi Technical University in Ghana adds an optional brief methodology and a section on limitation and delimitation; Bolgatanga Technical University separates delimitations from limitations; the 2013 UP Manila manual for graduate theses in the health sciences lets scope and limitations sit in the methodology chapter. Your department's format decides the headings.
Chapter One of the finished work also differs from the one in the proposal. Laikipia University's graduate school guidelines for theses and projects say of the introduction: “It differs significantly from the introduction for a proposal as it captures what the actual research involved.” Engineering and computing students can also read the final-year project report page; for the other chapters, see thesis chapter feedback.
A hypothetical example of a commentYour statement of the problem says lecturers' workload lowers student performance, but none of your four objectives mentions workload. Which objective, and which research question, takes up the problem you state?
A first comment on one part of your own draft, right away and without an account.
Get a free preview| Section | What it has to do | What the supervisor asks |
|---|---|---|
| Background to the study | Move from the wider topic to your setting and end at the problem | Does each paragraph lead to the problem, or is it a general essay on the topic? |
| Statement of the problem | Say what is wrong, where, and what is not yet known about it | Can you state the problem in two sentences, and is there evidence that it exists in your setting? |
| Purpose and specific objectives | One general aim, then a small set of specific objectives | Does each objective name something the methodology can measure or examine? |
| Research questions | The objectives in question form | Can each question be answered with the data planned in Chapter Three? |
| Hypotheses | A testable prediction of the outcome of the study | Which test in Chapter Three decides each one? |
| Significance of the study | Who benefits from the findings, and how | What will each group you name do differently with the findings? |
| Scope or delimitation | What the study covers: content, place, population, period | Are these the same boundaries the population and sample in Chapter Three use? |
| Operational definition of terms | How key variables are defined in this study | Does each definition match how the instrument measures the variable? |
Kumasi Technical University describes the job of this section: “This section identifies the research gaps to justify the conduct of the study. It leads one to state the research questions the study hopes to answer and serves as the guide in formulating the specific objectives of the study.”
Guides differ here. The School of Public Health at Jomo Kenyatta University of Agriculture and Technology (JKUAT), in its format for master's and doctoral proposals and theses, asks students to show why and how it is a problem, with support such as statistics, in two paragraphs at most. Laikipia University's graduate school guidelines treat the statement as the researcher's own voice and ask for no quotations or citations in it. Ask which approach your department follows.
A weak spot is a problem stated only as a gap in studies ("no study has been done on this in our local government area"). A reader then asks what goes wrong in practice, and for whom. For arguing the gap itself, see research gap in a thesis.
The objectives turn the problem into tasks. Kumasi Technical University gives a number: “About 3 or 4 objectives are appropriate. Avoid too many objectives.” At JKUAT's School of Public Health, the specific objectives have to be in line with the variables the study expects to influence the phenomenon under investigation.
The research questions then mirror the objectives. JKUAT's School of Public Health puts it in one line: “They should be in line with the specific objectives and equal in number.” Kumasi Technical University and Laikipia University also ask for questions that can't be answered with yes or no. More tests are on what is a research question?
The UNIZIK manual lists research questions and research hypotheses, each where applicable, and Kumasi Technical University lets the nature of the research decide between questions, hypotheses or both. Laikipia University's graduate school guidelines ask for one or the other, guided by the study focus, the type of research and the discipline. A made-up null hypothesis such as "There is no significant difference in mean achievement between students taught with and without laboratory sessions" sends the reader to Chapter Three for the test that compares those two means, and for the significance level.
Laikipia University's proposal guidelines say: “Scope and limitation are different and a distinction must be made.” The scope says what the study covers. The delimitations are the boundaries you chose, and Bolgatanga Technical University asks you to give reasons for them: “The delimitation segment of the study must explain why some specific choices were made while others were omitted.”
Limitations are constraints you didn't choose, such as a low return rate or access to one site instead of three. Kumasi Technical University's policy lists limited funds, time, sample size and data collection techniques. Say what each constraint did: fewer schools sampled, so the findings describe two schools and not the state. See also the limitations section.
Trace each element of Chapter One forward:
These fragments are made up. None of them comes from a real thesis.
Esmond evaluates every assignment before you submit. It never writes it.
Esmond is an AI tool that doesn't write for you. If your course doesn't allow any AI tools, don't use Esmond for that work. If you're unsure, ask your instructor or advisor.
In Chapter One, Esmond can flag what a project supervisor would question in the text you made: a problem that the objectives never take up, research questions that don't match the objectives in number or content, a hypothesis that no planned test can decide, a scope that differs from the sample described later, a term defined one way and measured another. The sample report shows the format of such a review, and how Esmond works explains the steps.
Esmond reads what you upload. If the file holds the whole draft, it can set this chapter against the others; if it holds one chapter, the review stays within that chapter and may raise a point that another chapter already answers.
Esmond doesn't check your chapter against your department's format, doesn't judge whether a topic will be accepted, and adds no text. Your supervisor decides what the chapter needs; you decide which points to act on.
Your department's format decides. The UNIZIK Manual of Style lists the sections from background to research hypotheses; other guides quoted here add limitations, delimitations or a brief methodology.
None of the guides quoted here sets a length for the whole chapter. Some set limits for parts: JKUAT's School of Public Health keeps the background to one and a half pages and the problem statement to two paragraphs, and Laikipia University suggests about two pages of background for a master's thesis or project. Ask your supervisor for your department's expectation.
It depends on the guide. The UNIZIK manual includes each where applicable, Kumasi Technical University allows either or both, and Laikipia University's graduate school guidelines ask for one or the other. If you use hypotheses, each one needs a test in Chapter Three.
The scope, or delimitation, is the boundary you set; limitations are constraints you did not choose. Laikipia University asks for the two to be kept apart, and Bolgatanga Technical University asks for reasons behind the delimitations.
Read on November 8, 2026.
Get your paper evaluated before you submit